Adam Vaughan on Transit City
Ward 20 Councillor, Adam Vaughan, has been a fierce
advocate for Toronto and a reasoned voice on City Council for good planning and
fiscal responsibility. In all the misleading information about Transit
City coming from the new mayor and his right wing supporters, Adam has
continued to speak about transit with an understanding of the needs of the
city, and a clear vision of what the city can become if enlightened
policies are followed.
What follows is a letter that Adam has written to his
constituents explaining why he intends to continue his support of Transit
City. We understand that this is a departure from the usual focus of the
CommunityAIR blog of the airport and the Waterfront, but we feel the issue is
very important and Adam's views deserve to be heard.
Dear Residents;
Over the past week, I have received thousands of emails in support of
Transit City. I am in the process of replying to each of those letters, but
in the meantime I wanted to be sure that you know where I stand on this
important programme.
I have always supported Transit City and continue to believe that it is the
best opportunity to provide a mass transit network to the City of Toronto. It is
not simply the best we can do under the circumstances; it’s the right thing to
do period.
As a municipal project, much more than just transportation needs are
addressed by Transit City. The programme delivers train service to virtually
every corner of the city while providing opportunities for economic, social and
cultural renewal to some of Toronto's most distressed neighbourhoods.
Transit City provides cheap, efficient and environmentally sound
transportation to the city’s priority neighbourhoods. These are communities that
are struggling under the weight of poor housing, social isolation and diminished
economic opportunity. Transit City delivers connectivity and affluence to these
areas. With the introduction of Transit City, land values go up and create
platforms for revitalization of the housing stock which will bring jobs and
economic opportunity to the commercial properties in the area. New tax revenue
flows from this investment. City-owned lands increase in value and public
investments in local social infrastructure like schools, libraries, community
health centres and recreation centres suddenly become more sustainable.
The innovative Tower Renewal Project relies on land values being inflated
by proximity to transit. Open fields and abandoned industrial land, like the
properties around the Woodbine racetrack, are brought to market with an
investment and service like Transit City. Other city projects like the
revitalization of the Yonge-Eglinton bus bays also benefit by becoming major
transit nodes. Without the additional lines that Transit City provides, these
projects will fail to deliver the economic and social benefits first predicted.
The city will be left poorer as a result.
Cancelling Transit City will also cost the city hundreds of millions of
dollars in penalties and unneeded studies and Environmental Assessments.
Additionally, despite the expenditures the city is left with the status quo. The
status quo is a woefully deficient transportation system. According to the Board
of Trade gridlock is currently costing Toronto’s economy billions in lost
productivity.
Replacing the transit part of the city’s approach to fighting gridlock from Light Rapid Transit (LRT) to subways will cost billions more and actually deliver less service, or at best, the same amount of transit capacity. The only thing that changes is the length of a bus ride and the station you arrive at.
Replacing the transit part of the city’s approach to fighting gridlock from Light Rapid Transit (LRT) to subways will cost billions more and actually deliver less service, or at best, the same amount of transit capacity. The only thing that changes is the length of a bus ride and the station you arrive at.
Financing
The incoming Mayor has said development charges can pay for the change in
strategy. Intensification was already a controversial part of the Transit City
costing estimates. Suburban neighbourhoods are on record as being opposed to
doubling the as-of-right heights on streets with proposed LRTs. If jumping from
3 stories to 6 stories is currently unacceptable, what will these communities
say when 40 storey towers are proposed along subway routes? To pay for the
increased costs for subway lines through development charges, hundreds of
buildings in this scale would need to be built. Putting aside whether the
residents in these areas could stomach this kind of intensification, can the
market absorb this kind of massive infusion of new units along suburban
thoroughfares?
Setting Priorities & Planning
Then there is the issue of which line to build first. Do we extend
Sheppard? Do we replace the Scarborough LRT? Is it the Finch Loop? After that
decision is made, there is the cost and time involved in designing a new line,
re-structuring a vehicle purchase to add subways and then the timelines for
acquiring property, realigning underground infrastructure, switching the
tunnelling contracts and building the one or two extra stations to meet the
goals of subway first and subways only as a priority. None of this includes the
legal fees attached to changing the plans.
Collateral Costs
Surface transportation also offers other opportunities. Once you build a
subway, adding additional stops is virtually impossible. History also shows that
while surface rapid transit stretches out intensification and distributes
economic benefits along routes, subways tend to generate nodal developments with
little impact between stations. Additionally, the new LRTs ordered for Transit
City are not a good fit for our existing downtown streetcar lines. We may well
end up with massive inner city streetcars that propel service cuts to operate.
Subways also need to be fed. In the suburbs massive bus bays will need to
be constructed to deliver passengers to the subway. Local density is not enough.
This too will cost money or underperforming lines will drive up costs or force
service cuts elsewhere.
In other words after billions of new dollars, years of delay and
construction and hundreds of other impacts what we end up with is a slightly
more convenient subway line for a very few people and the status quo if we are
lucky for the rest.
Respect for Taxpayers?
All of this has been decided without a public debate or comprehensive
analysis of the impact of a decision made by one person, alone in an office at
City Hall. This is not only no way to run a rail road, it’s no way to run a
city.
Some of the leadership of City Hall may have changed, but the values, needs
and expectations of Toronto residents have not. I am heartened by your
willingness to speak up for the kind of City you want to build with us here at
City Hall. We need to work together to ensure that residents across our
City understand the importance of delivering Transit City and that they join
with us in this fight.
Please encourage your networks to send letters and make calls to the Mayor,
Executive Committee members, TTC Commissioners and Councillors.
In the meantime I will fight to save Transit City, as a councillor, as a
citizen and as a Toronto transit rider.
Sincerely,
Adam Vaughan
Adam Vaughan
Councillor Adam Vaughan
Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina
416-392-4044

Comments