Porter's IPO: A not-so-rosy picture
This Weeks Travel News: Porter’s IPO Prospectus Reveals Not-So-Rosy Picture
Porter’s IPO Prospectus Reveals Not-So-Rosy Picture, Making A Mountain Out Of A Volcano? Experts Don’t Think So, Come Insured Or Not, Says Cuba, and Best Of A Bad Lot: U.S. Airlines Rated
Porter’s IPO Prospectus
Reveals Not-So-Rosy
Picture
Privately-owned airlines don’t have to reveal their
financial situation, so we’ve always had to take Porter
Airlines founder Robert Deluce at his word when he
claimed the carrier was profitable, even in a fiercely competitive
market. But
Porter is looking for new funding — $120 million of it – through an
initial
public offering, so it had to take the wraps off its finances. What was
revealed
was what most industry insiders have believed for a long time: while
Porter has
found a willing audience for its high-service, high-convenience offering
from Toronto’s Island Airport, it isn’t making a
profit. In
2009, Porter lost $4.6 million on revenues of $151.2 million. That
number can be
added to the $23 million the airline lost between its launch in October
2006 and
Dec. 31, 2008. Porter’s initial launch was backed by $125 million in
equity
financing from shareholders. It started out with just two Bombardier
Q400
turboprops – by the end of this month it will own 20 of them. Unlike Air
Canada
and WestJet, Porter has never had to reveal its load factor either – the
percentage of seats sold on flights. Opponents of Porter’s Island
Airport
expansion have used spotters to estimate loads, and they have maintained
that
most flights are less than half full. Turns out they were right: in the
first
quarter of this year load factor hit 47%, up from 41% in the same
quarter in
2009. As Brent Jang reported in the Globe and Mail, much
of Porter’s
competitive edge, particularly in the Toronto/Montreal/Ottawa triangle,
can be
attributed to its monopoly on the island. That may change later this
year, with
Air Canada Jazz making plans to move back
in. Will
Porter’s prospectus picture impact its ability to raise funds? Quite
possibly
not: the carrier’s P&L numbers aren’t really that bad in comparison
with the
rest of the industry, and there are plenty of government and Bay Street
high
flyers loath to lose their leather seats and Porter lounge
espressos.

Comments