Flight paths & approaches
Hello Gus,
The published & preferred "approach" and
"departure" routes over the inner harbor enter and exit respectively
through the eastern gap. At least, that is the intention of Noise
Abatement procedures in use at the Island Airport. Of course, not all
pilots comply with these requirements and unfortunately the reasons are
as numerous as the transgressions.
With respect to an "approach"
path flown OVER Ward's Island to the Island Airport, under good weather
conditions pilots will fly what is termed a "visual" approach. In this
case, the pilot has the runway in sight and will proceed by visual
means to the airport for landing. No one "designates" the path of a
visual approach as it is flown at the pilots discretion (speed,
altitude, route etc).
The fact that an aircraft is landing means
that it's flight path is an approach. Approaches are not governed by
minimum altitudes like an overflight (overflight eg:= flying from
Oshawa to Hamilton) would be because the pilot is maneuvering the
aircraft to land.
For example, a requirement to stay 1000ft above a
built up area on an approach would mean that pilots might never get low
enough to safely complete the approach and land on the runway because
they were too high to land.
In other words, the restriction could
delay the pilots ability to descend the aircraft to an appropriate
altitude for a safe landing.
The fact that a pilot overflies
homes on their approach is not a dangerous occurrence in and of itself.
It is noisy and most likely unnecessary but under normal circumstances
does not pose a threat to the properties below. By the time an aircraft
landing at the Island is near Ward's Island, they would be required to
have the runway in sight. If they can see the runway, it stands to
reason that they can see everything between them and the runway.
Therefore, if the pilot can see the runway and all obstacles between
them and their landing, the chances of a collision are not impossible
but highly improbable. Of course, as Mr. Lipton points out, we would
all prefer the flight path to be away from residential pockets in the
event of a pilot error or mechanical problems and the published
procedures are written with this intention.
Hope this helps.
Joe

Comments